Fraudulent Real Estate Transactions – Will it Ever Stop?

fraudulent real estate transactions

Fraudulent Real Estate Transactions, Protect Yourself Out There And Make Sure You Aren’t One of the Bad Guys

Fraudulent real estate transactions drive me crazy because of the bad name it gives credible investors.  It  just keeps happening over and over again.

It started this past week after a long dry spell of not seeing any fraudulent transactions in deals we were looking at. Suddenly, we were staring at 4 different ones in just a few of days. We actually saw a fifth one.  However, I have been told by a higher authority not to write about it until the “hammer falls” on the culprits.

In order for the appropriate authorities not to get mad at me for exposing the people involved and so they don’t take flight, or sue me for slander, the summaries will be somewhat vague:

1. The first obvious fraud was almost expected as it was a Quitclaim Deed for a property in Miami-Dade County. This deed was somewhat akin to a rocket volley going off at a fourth of July celebration. The beneficiary of an estate called us.  This beneficiary wanted to sell but explained he wasn’t on title as he had thought.  Even stranger to him was that unknown people were living in the property. Yet he still wanted us to buy it!

It took seconds to see the fraudulent deed in the public records. Two years ago the seller (caller’s mother) deeded the property to a buyer who had re-sold the property to the current owners. However, his mother was physically and mentally incapable of signing anything at the time.  She lived in another state under constant nursing care. Even her signature in the public record was obviously a fake.  The notary on the document had carefully “twisted” his/her seal so you couldn’t read his/her name or ID number or his/her signature.

So here we are again.  It is an obvious forgery on a quitclaim deed and a deal that was deader than road-kill. That deal is now in the hands of the White Collar Crime Division. But what would have happened if the deal had gone through because the caller hadn’t checked?  Or if a careless closing agent didn’t care enough to contact the former seller (who is now deceased)? It would have been a fraud claim against the title policy.  It would have made a lot of trouble for everyone involved except the investor seller who got away with the money. The lesson here is, “If there is a Quitclaim Deed in the chain of title, BE CAREFUL!

2. The second interesting event started when I was requested to review the details of a short sale where it should have been a standard “A to C” transaction but an investor got in the middle. A conventional lender was funding the end-buyer “C”.  The investor was “hidden in the transaction” inside a land trust.  This investor used a second/third lien on the closing statement to get paid his spread. I warned the parties to the transaction that this was the typical bank fraud that so many California investors are being prosecuted for. I am making this one very short so as not to get into the mix of the parties involved. The deal closed.  The investor took out a huge chunk of change.  End-buyers were happy.  Realtors® got paid.  The seller was out of the property via a short sale.  So all were happy.

However, think what the buyer’s lender would think if he knew his funds had been used to pay for the investor’s purchase.  What would the seller’s lender think if he knew he negotiated in good faith to reduce the mortgage principal and all the while the investor was making a killing from the mortgage principal reduction?

Some gurus around the country are actually teaching very similar methods of defrauding lenders “legally” in short sales. Somehow the words defrauding and legally don’t seem to go together. Greed tends to twist minds in strange ways. You can do short sales and take out spreads, just know that they can be done legally or with prison time attached.

3. Just yesterday a very nice man called who went into great detail of how he was in foreclosure.  He had actually received his eviction notice the week before. This man was hoping we could find a buyer for his property because the lender had gotten the deed via the auction.  The lender was willing to sell it as a “short pay” to him for $75,000.  This was from an original judgment amount of over $300,000. Great discount but why not do a loan modification early in the game?

The situation grew more complicated when I heard the rest of the story of how an investor “rescued” him by taking over his mortgage payments “subject to”.  The investor did this while deeding the property away from the homeowner. The homeowner agreed to make “mortgage” payments to the investor for two years (24 Months).  After that time, the investor would sell the home back to the original homeowner. The investor stopped making the mortgage payments.  He re-sold the property to another investor who also never made any mortgage payments but still collected “mortgage” payments from the former homeowner.

At this stage the original homeowner was not on title.  The lender knew that and made him the “short pay” for $75,000 offer because of the title fraud. To make things even worse the Attorney General’s Office said they would pursue criminal charges against the investors.  However, the former homeowner had to file a civil suit to recover any money or to keep his property! All of this was while taking care of his very ill mother.  She was living with him because they can’t afford to keep her in a medical facility.

What was the point of the investor taking the property in the first place? It appears the investor only wanted to collect a few rent/mortgage payments and not pay the mortgage. These are the types of investors who our industry is negatively associated with.  It is no wonder some homeowners call investors predatory.

4. In the final case, two Realtors®, not from our area, pleaded guilty to charges of “flopping”. What they did was rig short sales to mislead the loss mitigation reps who made the final approval decisions. They did this in various ways that investors have frankly been taught for years on how to “influence the BPOs”. They compounded the problem by taking the profits themselves.  They withheld the higher offers for the short sales from the loss mit reps.  They essentially defrauded the lenders of income – bank fraud.

I know that there are tons of you reading this and saying, “I have done it for years and it’s legal”. You may be in for a surprise in the near future. Short sales are becoming more popular because of the REOs being withdrawn from the market – short-term. This leads to more bidders on the same deals so be careful out there.  Watch to see if your short sale offer is greater than the sale price.  Make your report to the appropriate authorities if it happens. Just because you make a profit and walk away to do another deal doesn’t mean you are doing it legally.

I could write full “Insights” about each of these cases.  Practically speaking if you don’t get it by now, naming names won’t help you. If you are thinking about doing anything even near what I mentioned above, think of the long-term ramifications.  Think about the hurtfulness to the homeowners and the possible cost to you and your loved ones. As always, contact an attorney for legal advice.

fraudulent real estate transactions

To your limitless success,

Dave Dinkel

Real Estate Mentor Program Founder

Visit davedinkel.com for full privacy policy, terms of use, etc.  Be sure to contact us through the website at davedinkel.com if you have questions or concerns (support@davedinkel.com).  Results mentioned in this presentation and any video, article, and/or material related to Dave Dinkel and his associated businesses are not typical nor are a guarantee of any earning potential.  No advice is to be construed as legal, accounting, or professional advice EVER.  Please consult related licensed and qualified professionals before taking any action.  No person(s) mentioned in the articles and /or shown on videos received compensation in any form for their opinions.

 

Follow Dave Dinkel on
This entry was posted in Articles, Dave Dinkel's Weekly Insights and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.